The Health Ranger is refusing to go quietly after YouTube censored him by deleting his channel and the 1700 videos he created about health and wellness and government tyranny.  Using a new platform, Adams says that the country is on a collision course with mass chaos and there’s little we can do about it except hope for the best and prepare for the worst.

“It will very likely erupt into widespread social unrest,” Adams begins. Adams says that the vast amount of political infighting is going to eventually spill over and affect us all.  He’s right of course, but that begs the very question: what do we even need the government for anymore? They don’t really do anything except limit our rights and devalue our labor and money by selling our freedom to the highest corporate bidder or global elitist.

“We’re gonna have an eruption of social chaos no matter who gets to the finish line first. Let me explain. If the Democrats get to the finish line first, and they manage to fabricate some kind of crime and attribute it to Donald Trump or fabricate evidence that quote ‘proves that there was collusion with Russia,’ …and they call for impeachment and there is an actual impeachment effort underway, middle America will erupt.”

“The people who elected Donald Trump will not stand for a political coup to take place in Washington DC.”

“On the flip side… if Obama and Hillary Clinton are named in the corruption, guess what? The left goes berzerk. The left goes insane… the left is just waiting for an excuse to engage in mass chaos.”

Adams is not calling for mass chaos, he explains that he’s simply predicting that all of this will happen because of the polarization in politics at this point in history. “I don’t see how America gets out of this without social chaos,” Adams said.

If you don’t stand up when you see others being censored, then please don’t complain when the social media giants censor you as well.  I think that Dr Michael Brown made this point exceedingly well in his most recent article…

First they came for Infowars, and I did not speak out — because I found them offensive.

Then they came for Geller and Spencer, and I did not speak out — because I found them obnoxious.

Then they came for Prager U, and I did not speak out — because I found them opinionated.

Then they came for a host of others, and I did not speak out — because I have my own life to live.

Then they came for me — and there was no one left to speak for me.

Top 20 cities at risk‚ identified by WWF:

1. Cape Town

2. Tel Aviv‚ Israel

3. Valparaíso‚ Chile

4. Amman‚ Jordan

5. Havana‚ Cuba

6. Oxnard‚ US

7. Santa Barbara‚ US

8. Agadir‚ Morocco

9. Casablanca‚ Morocco

10. Tunis‚ Tunisia

11. Bathinda‚ India

12. Meerut‚ India

13. Tbilisi‚ Georgia

14. Madrid‚ Spain

15. João Pessoa‚ Brazil

16. Santiago‚ Chile

17. Chengdu‚ China

18. San Diego‚ US

19. Gurgaon‚ India

20. Siliguri‚ India.

"Mrs Merkel has a lot of responsibility for what's happened, because she took a unilateral decision (referring to migration), without any real discussion with her EU partners," said one Italian man in Brussels. Another added: "I don't think that the Italians are Eurosceptics, I think Italians have been waiting for answers from politicians. The answers haven't come for many years. So people vote to make politicians react."

But in Brussels, there's a feeling that voters have become confused about the issues at the heart of Italy's vote. "This is a European trend, like with Brexit. Unfortunately people talk about migration by connecting it to social distress, that is actually a result of the economic crisis," said Cecile Kyenge, an Italian centre-left MEP.

For forces in the EU parliament, driving a Eurosceptic agenda, the outcome of Italy's poll is a step forward. "They do not wish the EU to continue in this way of a federal Europe or united states of Europe or deeper integration, and hope that this message will be heard by Mr Juncker, Chancellor Merkel and President Macron," said Jan Zahradil, a Czech Conservative MEP.

Germany should replace “Vaterland”, or fatherland, with “Heimatland,” or homeland, and substitute “courageously with heart and hand” for “brotherly with heart and hand”, she wrote. The proposal surfaced hours before Germany’s center-left Social Democrats (SPD) announced that 66 percent of its members backed a re-run of the coalition with Chancellor Angela Merkel’s conservatives that has ruled Germany since 2013.

The SPD is slated to retain the family ministry in the new government, while Horst Seehofer, leader of the CSU Bavarian conservatives, will head an expanded interior ministry that will also focus on “Heimat” or homeland. The first stanza, with its words “Germany, Germany above all else” - which stemmed from efforts to unify Germany in the 19th century - and the second, with its refrain of “Germany women, German loyalty, German wine and German song” were officially dropped from the anthem in 1991 following reunification.

“Completely over the top, and not even an April Fool’s joke,” tweeted a branch of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party in the southern state of Baden-Wuerttemberg. Another said: “If that happens, I want to change (the phrase) ‘mother tongue’ too.”

The Washington Post reports that after Democrats settled down, Delegate Joseph Lindsey (Democrat for Norfolk) told the House that “today, I have been offended as I can never recall since being a part of this body. And I have seen many of my colleagues emotionally shaken and bothered.” 

Freitas: “I just want to remind everyone of something very quickly. It was not our party that supported slavery, that fought women’s suffrage, that rounded up tens of thousands of Asian Americans and put them in concentration camps, that supported Jim Crow, that supported segregation or supported mass resistance. That wasn’t our party. That was the Democrat party.”

Freitas served with the 82nd Airborne Division and 25th Light Infantry Division as an Infantryman. Following the terror attack on September 11 2001, Nick volunteered for US Army Special Forces (Green Berets) and eventually served 2 tours in Iraq as a Special Forces Weapons Sergeant and Special Forces Intelligence Sergeant.

Online behaviour will inevitably be a big part of what is monitored, and algorithms will be key to everything, though there remain doubts about whether something so ambitious will ever come to full fruition. One of the scheme’s basic aims is to use a vast amount of data to create individual ratings, which will decide people’s access – or lack of it – to everything from travel to jobs.

In the short term, the biggest consequences will arrive in the field of insurance, where the collective pooling of risk is set to be supplanted by models that focus tightly on individuals. Thanks to connected devices, insurers could soon know how much television you watch, whether you always obey traffic signals, and how well your household plumbing works. Already, car insurance schemes offer lower premiums if people install tracking devices that monitor their driving habits; and health insurance companies such as the British firm Vitality offer deals based on access to data from fitness trackers.

In the near future, as with Sesame Credit, people will presumably sign up for surveillance-based insurance in their droves because of such simple incentives, and those squeamish about privacy may simply have to pay more. Many people, of course, will simply be deemed impossible to protect.

First the team fed a neural network huge numbers of pictures of faces, which taught it to spot characteristics and patterns in the photos. After it had learned to distinguish these characteristics it was then taught to match these characteristics with patterns of brain activity recorded in EEG scans, whilst observing the same faces.

“When we see something, our brain creates a mental percept, which is essentially a mental impression of that thing," Dan Nemrodov, who works at the lab explained in a statement. "We were able to capture this percept using EEG to get a direct illustration of what’s happening in the brain during this process.” 

Volunteers in the experiment had EEG sensors attached to them before they were shown images of faces. The AI was then able to reconstruct faces using information read from these EEG scans with astonishing and slightly creepy accuracy.

The last week has brought more reports about Iran’s establishment in Syria – the deployment of Shiite militias, the presence of military experts, soldiers from Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps, as well as plans to build bases and weapons factories. First The New York Times published a detailed map showing the Iranian reinforcement, now Fox News reports that the new base near Damascus includes big hangars, that could house missiles capable of hitting anywhere in Israel.

These reports follow a number of other developments, one being Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s unusual speech last week at the International Security Conference in Munich, Germany, on February 18. There for the first time he threatened a direct hit on Iran and military action against the Assad regime. Another is Netanyahu’s anticipated meeting with US President Donald Trump in Washington… and when a group of senators returned home from visiting Israel, they stated that the new threats by Iran require the administration to reconsider giving Israel more military aid.

In other words, in light of the Fox News report, it's fair to assume that the countdown has started for another aerial clash in the Syrian skies. Even with the parties stating that they do not want war, it will take extraordinary navigational skills to prevent matters from spiraling out of control.

However, because the ‘Most Favoured Nation’ rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO) require tariffs to be levied at the same rate for all third-party countries, these charges will also apply to European Union countries, including Britain. This could be avoided by a free trade agreement, but the EU has failed to negotiate one with the US, and Brussels does not allow individual member-states to negotiate their own trade deals.

The European Union has taken a hostile line in response, threatening a “trade war”. “The Commission will bring forward in the next few days a proposal for World Trade Organization-compatible countermeasures against the US to rebalance the situation,” vowed Jean-Claude Juncker, who heads the unelected European Commission. “The EU has been a close security ally of the US for decades. We will not sit idly while our industry is hit with unfair measures that put thousands of European jobs at risk. I had the occasion to say that the EU would react adequately and that’s what we will do,” he said.

The British government is also prevented from favouring British steel for public contracts by EU competition and tendering rules — so much so that even the scaffolding around the Elizabeth Tower which houses Big Ben uses foreign steel. It is likely that Continental producers will focus on the British market even more if a new tariff regime impacts their competitiveness outside Europe, which could put British industry in jeopardy.

Britain is already down to its last aluminium smelter, and the steel industry — which enjoyed a mild recovery after the EU referendum due to the fall in sterling boosting competitiveness — remains vulnerable.

In those circumstances, countries try to steal growth from trading partners by cheapening their currencies to promote exports and create export-related jobs. The problem with currency wars is that they are zero-sum or negative-sum games. It is true that countries can obtain short-term relief by cheapening their currencies, but sooner than later, their trading partners also cheapen their currencies to regain the export advantage.

This process of tit-for-tat devaluations feeds on itself with the pendulum of short-term trade advantage swinging back and forth and no one getting any further ahead. After a few years, the futility of currency wars becomes apparent, and countries resort to trade wars. This consists of punitive tariffs, export subsidies and nontariff barriers to trade.

The dynamic is the same as in a currency war. The first country to impose tariffs gets a short-term advantage, but retaliation is not long in coming and the initial advantage is eliminated as trading partners impose tariffs in response. Despite the illusion of short-term advantage, in the long-run everyone is worse off. The original condition of too much debt and too little growth never goes away.

Finally, tensions rise, rival blocs are formed and a shooting war begins. The shooting wars often have a not-so-hidden economic grievance or rationale behind them.

Much of this trend is due to historical illiteracy and a failure to teach an entire generation about the destruction that has been perpetrated by previous communist regimes. At the same time, they are uninformed about the failures and desperations experienced in current communist countries, such as Venezuela and Cuba.

Today’s millennials are hard-pressed to even define socialism and communism. They feel at odds with capitalism and simply feel any alternative would be better, although many haven’t started working or become a part of the workforce thanks to the pro wall street policies practiced by the Federal Reserve.

One of the lures of socialism is the same one proselytized by Karl Marx: the division of wealth. High earners and inherited wealth are seen as unfairly depriving the rest of the population of their “fair share,” although most millennials are unable to elaborate clearly on the concept. A mere third of millennials can even correctly define socialism. Only half can identify capitalism as the free market economic system that lured millions of their ancestors to American shores.

For those who thought the Cold War is at an end, these trends are a disturbing wakeup call. This time, however, the chill is not across the Atlantic. Socialism is on the rise as a threat to America, but the threat is coming from America’s own newest generation of voters, who weren’t even born when the Berlin Wall magnificently collapsed to the cheer of millions. They were, ironically, raised during one of history’s most prosperous periods while being indoctrinated into ideologies their grandparents died to obliterate.